Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Outlook or Outlook Express

Author
24 Jun 2009 6:29 PM
win
I am using Outlook at home. I started using Outlook simply because it was the
one I learned to use at work. I never though of using Outlook Express but
always wondered why there are two seemingly identical programs.

Will anyone let me know which program is more appropriate for a home pc
user? and why?

Thanks.

Author
24 Jun 2009 6:50 PM
Tom Willett
You decide:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/help/HA010565781033.aspx

Show quoteHide quote
"win" <w**@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9D6A517A-DF3E-4094-887C-0D20D17D6B09@microsoft.com...
:I am using Outlook at home. I started using Outlook simply because it was
the
: one I learned to use at work. I never though of using Outlook Express but
: always wondered why there are two seemingly identical programs.
:
: Will anyone let me know which program is more appropriate for a home pc
: user? and why?
:
: Thanks.
Author
24 Jun 2009 6:54 PM
Ken Blake, MVP
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:29:02 -0700, win
<w**@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

> I am using Outlook at home. I started using Outlook simply because it was the
> one I learned to use at work. I never though of using Outlook Express but
> always wondered why there are two seemingly identical programs.



They are not at all identical, and they have different sets of
features.

Outlook Express is an e-mail client and newsreader.

Outlook is a personal information manager. It also does e-mail, but
not newsgroups.

The two different sets of features overlaps only in a single place:
they both do e-mail.


> Will anyone let me know which program is more appropriate for a home pc
> user? and why?


There is no answer to that question. We all have different needs and
different desires. Which is better for *you* depends on which set of
features *you* want.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
Author
24 Jun 2009 7:45 PM
DaffyD®
I prefer Outlook Express at home for it's newsreader and simple operation.
I don't need Outlook's features since I don't have the Microsoft Exchange
Server installed. at home.


Show quoteHide quote
"win" <w**@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9D6A517A-DF3E-4094-887C-0D20D17D6B09@microsoft.com...
> I am using Outlook at home. I started using Outlook simply because it was
the
> one I learned to use at work. I never though of using Outlook Express but
> always wondered why there are two seemingly identical programs.
>
> Will anyone let me know which program is more appropriate for a home pc
> user? and why?
>
> Thanks.
Author
24 Jun 2009 7:53 PM
Tom Willett
An exchange server isn't required for many or most of the Outlook features.

Show quoteHide quote
"DaffyD®" <daf***@woohoo.com> wrote in message
news:uRdWmRQ9JHA.2872@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
:I prefer Outlook Express at home for it's newsreader and simple operation.
: I don't need Outlook's features since I don't have the Microsoft Exchange
: Server installed. at home.
:
:
: "win" <w**@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
: news:9D6A517A-DF3E-4094-887C-0D20D17D6B09@microsoft.com...
: > I am using Outlook at home. I started using Outlook simply because it
was
: the
: > one I learned to use at work. I never though of using Outlook Express
but
: > always wondered why there are two seemingly identical programs.
: >
: > Will anyone let me know which program is more appropriate for a home pc
: > user? and why?
: >
: > Thanks.
:
:
Author
24 Jun 2009 9:39 PM
win
Thank you all for your reply.

I read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlook_Express that says 'In Windows
Vista, Outlook Express is replaced with Windows Mail. Windows Live Mail has
since been released as the successor to Outlook Express and Windows Mail. '

This is eye-opening since I am planning to get a pc with Windows Vista.
Then, Outlook Express is no longer there, right? I think I could have Windows
Live Mail even now? Yes?

So, a home user like myself who is not using OE shouldn't worry about it any
longer, right?  Then, if I have a hotmail account, it is the same as I am
using Outlook Express, in a way?

I use Outlook's 'details' tab for family's and friends' birthday. It reminds
me of those days.

Maybe, I should check on Windows Live Mail now?


Show quoteHide quote
"Tom Willett" wrote:

> An exchange server isn't required for many or most of the Outlook features.
>
> "DaffyD®" <daf***@woohoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uRdWmRQ9JHA.2872@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> :I prefer Outlook Express at home for it's newsreader and simple operation.
> : I don't need Outlook's features since I don't have the Microsoft Exchange
> : Server installed. at home.
> :
> :
> : "win" <w**@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> : news:9D6A517A-DF3E-4094-887C-0D20D17D6B09@microsoft.com...
> : > I am using Outlook at home. I started using Outlook simply because it
> was
> : the
> : > one I learned to use at work. I never though of using Outlook Express
> but
> : > always wondered why there are two seemingly identical programs.
> : >
> : > Will anyone let me know which program is more appropriate for a home pc
> : > user? and why?
> : >
> : > Thanks.
> :
> :
>
>
>
Author
25 Jun 2009 3:14 AM
Diane Poremsky [MVP]
Live mail is very much like OE and works on XP too.  Hotmail accounts work
in both live mail and outlook.

--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com

Outlook Tips by email:
mailto:dailytips-subscribe-requ***@lists.outlooktips.net

EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
mailto:EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQU***@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Let's Really Fix Outlook 2010
http://forums.slipstick.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34

Show quoteHide quote
"win" <w**@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:57FD3BA1-2385-4383-899F-613C87841123@microsoft.com...
> Thank you all for your reply.
>
> I read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlook_Express that says 'In Windows
> Vista, Outlook Express is replaced with Windows Mail. Windows Live Mail
> has
> since been released as the successor to Outlook Express and Windows Mail.
> '
>
> This is eye-opening since I am planning to get a pc with Windows Vista.
> Then, Outlook Express is no longer there, right? I think I could have
> Windows
> Live Mail even now? Yes?
>
> So, a home user like myself who is not using OE shouldn't worry about it
> any
> longer, right?  Then, if I have a hotmail account, it is the same as I am
> using Outlook Express, in a way?
>
> I use Outlook's 'details' tab for family's and friends' birthday. It
> reminds
> me of those days.
>
> Maybe, I should check on Windows Live Mail now?
>
>
> "Tom Willett" wrote:
>
>> An exchange server isn't required for many or most of the Outlook
>> features.
>>
>> "DaffyD®" <daf***@woohoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:uRdWmRQ9JHA.2872@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> :I prefer Outlook Express at home for it's newsreader and simple
>> operation.
>> : I don't need Outlook's features since I don't have the Microsoft
>> Exchange
>> : Server installed. at home.
>> :
>> :
>> : "win" <w**@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> : news:9D6A517A-DF3E-4094-887C-0D20D17D6B09@microsoft.com...
>> : > I am using Outlook at home. I started using Outlook simply because it
>> was
>> : the
>> : > one I learned to use at work. I never though of using Outlook Express
>> but
>> : > always wondered why there are two seemingly identical programs.
>> : >
>> : > Will anyone let me know which program is more appropriate for a home
>> pc
>> : > user? and why?
>> : >
>> : > Thanks.
>> :
>> :
>>
>>
>>
Author
25 Jun 2009 12:10 PM
Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]
"DaffyD." <daf***@woohoo.com> wrote in message
news:uRdWmRQ9JHA.2872@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>I prefer Outlook Express at home for it's newsreader and simple operation.
> I don't need Outlook's features since I don't have the Microsoft Exchange
> Server installed. at home.

I don't have an Exchage server at home, either, but I sure do make use of
Outlook's features despite that.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
Author
26 Jun 2009 8:39 AM
Jo Foster
i have transferred my Outlook 2003 to new laptop, which comes with Vista.
this has added many new confusing features which could be useful if they were
explained, eg in a contact, clicking activities brings up lots of old emails.
i need reassurance that outlook 2003 is compatible with vista before
investing too much time entering details. could it get overloaded and crash?

Show quoteHide quote
"Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]" wrote:

> "DaffyD." <daf***@woohoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uRdWmRQ9JHA.2872@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
> >I prefer Outlook Express at home for it's newsreader and simple operation.
> > I don't need Outlook's features since I don't have the Microsoft Exchange
> > Server installed. at home.
>
> I don't have an Exchage server at home, either, but I sure do make use of
> Outlook's features despite that.
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
>
>
Author
26 Jun 2009 12:11 PM
Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]
"Jo Foster" <JoFos***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:97EA1013-A078-4842-A2F1-A0A11D232A5D@microsoft.com...

>i have transferred my Outlook 2003 to new laptop, which comes with Vista.
> this has added many new confusing features which could be useful if they
> were
> explained, eg in a contact, clicking activities brings up lots of old
> emails.
> i need reassurance that outlook 2003 is compatible with vista before
> investing too much time entering details. could it get overloaded and crash?

Outlook 2003 is completely supported on Vista.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
Author
26 Jun 2009 9:52 PM
Jo Foster
thaks brian. i haven't found any "help" which explains the new features -
only a lot of stuff i don't understand and would probably not use!

Show quoteHide quote
"Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]" wrote:

> "Jo Foster" <JoFos***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:97EA1013-A078-4842-A2F1-A0A11D232A5D@microsoft.com...
>
> >i have transferred my Outlook 2003 to new laptop, which comes with Vista.
> > this has added many new confusing features which could be useful if they
> > were
> > explained, eg in a contact, clicking activities brings up lots of old
> > emails.
> > i need reassurance that outlook 2003 is compatible with vista before
> > investing too much time entering details. could it get overloaded and crash?
>
> Outlook 2003 is completely supported on Vista.
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
>
>
Author
29 Jun 2009 12:07 PM
Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]
"Jo Foster" <JoFos***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AF0719A6-2C84-4822-85E0-A0899F45659F@microsoft.com...

> thaks brian. i haven't found any "help" which explains the new features -
> only a lot of stuff i don't understand and would probably not use!

Try reading some of the "Help and How To" information at
http://office.microsoft.com/
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]