|
outlook
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Address Book vs Contacts (again).Using Vista Home Premium and Microsoft Office Outlook 2007 (12.0.6316.5000)
Sp1. The structure of Address Books versus Contacts in Outlook has always been a mystery to me and will continue to be forever it seems. I hesitate to raise the topic again because it has been raised here so many times. I write today to ask why my Contacts listing is different when I refer to it using the "address book" icon at the top of an Outlook screen and reference it using the Contacts button (for me, bottom left hand side my Navigation Pane). The "Contacts button" version, synched with my my cell phone, is generally correct while the "addressbook icon" version has many entries missing. I can actually enter a new contact and immediately not find it using the rapid "icon" lookup but will find it it in "Contacts." What's going on? More importantly, what can I do about it? Regards, Denzil.
Show quote
Hide quote
"Denzil Hathway" <hath***@cox.net> wrote in message The "addressbook" view that appears when you click on the "To" button in a news:Oybg4GkrJHA.6040@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Using Vista Home Premium and Microsoft Office Outlook 2007 > (12.0.6316.5000) Sp1. > > The structure of Address Books versus Contacts in Outlook has always been > a mystery to me and will continue to be forever it seems. I hesitate to > raise the topic again because it has been raised here so many times. > > I write today to ask why my Contacts listing is different when I refer to > it using the "address book" icon at the top of an Outlook screen and > reference it using the Contacts button (for me, bottom left hand side my > Navigation Pane). > > The "Contacts button" version, synched with my my cell phone, is generally > correct while the "addressbook icon" version has many entries missing. I > can actually enter a new contact and immediately not find it using the > rapid "icon" lookup but will find it it in "Contacts." > > What's going on? More importantly, what can I do about it? Regards, > Denzil. new email message window only contains those contacts for which you have an electronic address, i.e. either an email address or a fax number. Those with just a plain telephone number will not appear. -- Asking a question? Please tell us the version of the application you are asking about, your OS, Service Pack level and the FULL contents of any error message(s) The Address Book is a filtered View of Contacts and only shows those that
have an electronic address / # eg email address, fax number Show quoteHide quote "Denzil Hathway" <hath***@cox.net> wrote in message news:Oybg4GkrJHA.6040@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Using Vista Home Premium and Microsoft Office Outlook 2007 > (12.0.6316.5000) Sp1. > > The structure of Address Books versus Contacts in Outlook has always been > a mystery to me and will continue to be forever it seems. I hesitate to > raise the topic again because it has been raised here so many times. > > I write today to ask why my Contacts listing is different when I refer to > it using the "address book" icon at the top of an Outlook screen and > reference it using the Contacts button (for me, bottom left hand side my > Navigation Pane). > > The "Contacts button" version, synched with my my cell phone, is generally > correct while the "addressbook icon" version has many entries missing. I > can actually enter a new contact and immediately not find it using the > rapid "icon" lookup but will find it it in "Contacts." > > What's going on? More importantly, what can I do about it? Regards, > Denzil.
MSOutlook Queries
cannot open outlook 2007 in Vista Outlook 2003 and Auto Fill/Resoulution Outlook 2003 will not close Group address book retrieving the deleted mails in outlook2003 Senders IP addr feature in Outlook2003 sending from outlook2007 to mac mail produces garbage Re: How users can clear the OLKEA folder Attempting to connect to Microsoft Communications |
|||||||||||||||||||||||