Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Re: Email Scanning

Author
17 Feb 2009 4:27 PM
D. Spencer Hines
VERY Unprofessional...

Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.

He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express, where
he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.

He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.

Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus.

Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...

KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.

DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.

DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...

THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY

Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.

Exitus Acta Probat.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"Steve Cochran" <scoch***@oehelp.com> wrote in message
news:D80B24DA-A72B-4E21-8D27-1A3B8644AA72@microsoft.com...

<Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted>
----------------------------------------------------------------

Email Scanning has never given me any problems.

This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
teapot as well as bum dope.

I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra layer
of protection...

If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss --
and their problem, when something goes wrong....

AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.

Benefits All 'Round...

For Both Me & My Correspondents.

It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.

I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard
drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.

Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.

Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows Live
Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

Further:

Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.

CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.

Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems

The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and _Goldfinger_]
uses redundant and overlapping security systems.

The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.

Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
systems.

Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ redundant
and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of little
rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....

Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these newsgroups
are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have seen
it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the
systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT regularly
Clean Up and Compact their files.

So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...

Amusing little fellows they are.

Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
--
D. Spencer Hines
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

Author
17 Feb 2009 5:02 PM
Peter Foldes
Aha. I see that you are starting the second phase of your trolling. Get a life
already

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

Show quoteHide quote
"D. Spencer Hines" <pant***@excelsior.net> wrote in message
news:%23AnTnyRkJHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> VERY Unprofessional...
>
> Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.
>
> He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express, where
> he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.
>
> He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.
>
> Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus.
>
> Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...
>
> KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.
>
> DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.
>
> DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...
>
> THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY
>
> Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.
>
> Exitus Acta Probat.
>
> DSH
> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
> Vires et Honor
>
> "Steve Cochran" <scoch***@oehelp.com> wrote in message
> news:D80B24DA-A72B-4E21-8D27-1A3B8644AA72@microsoft.com...
>
> <Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Email Scanning has never given me any problems.
>
> This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
> teapot as well as bum dope.
>
> I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra layer
> of protection...
>
> If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss --
> and their problem, when something goes wrong....
>
> AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.
>
> Benefits All 'Round...
>
> For Both Me & My Correspondents.
>
> It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
> that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.
>
> I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard
> drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.
>
> Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.
>
> Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows Live
> Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.
>
> DSH
> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
> Vires et Honor
>
> Further:
>
> Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>
> CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>
> Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems
>
> The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and _Goldfinger_]
> uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>
> The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>
> Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
> systems.
>
> Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ redundant
> and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of little
> rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....
>
> Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these newsgroups
> are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have seen
> it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the
> systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT regularly
> Clean Up and Compact their files.
>
> So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
> Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...
>
> Amusing little fellows they are.
>
> Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
> --
> D. Spencer Hines
> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
> Vires et Honor
> Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
>
Author
17 Feb 2009 7:57 PM
Hal Hostetler [MVP-P/I]
Not particularly bright, is he?

Hal
--
Hal Hostetler, CPBE -- h**@kvoa.com
Senior Engineer/MIS -- MS MVP-Print/Imaging -- WA7BGX
http://www.kvoa.com -- "When News breaks, we fix it!"
KVOA Television, Tucson, AZ.   NBC   Channel 4
Still Cadillacin' - www.badnewsbluesband.com

Show quoteHide quote
"Peter Foldes" <okf***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:edWoIGSkJHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Aha. I see that you are starting the second phase of your trolling. Get a
> life already
>
> --
> Peter
>
> Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
> Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
>
> "D. Spencer Hines" <pant***@excelsior.net> wrote in message
> news:%23AnTnyRkJHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> VERY Unprofessional...
>>
>> Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.
>>
>> He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
>> where
>> he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.
>>
>> He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.
>>
>> Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
>> opus.
>>
>> Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...
>>
>> KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.
>>
>> DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.
>>
>> DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...
>>
>> THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY
>>
>> Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.
>>
>> Exitus Acta Probat.
>>
>> DSH
>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>> Vires et Honor
>>
>> "Steve Cochran" <scoch***@oehelp.com> wrote in message
>> news:D80B24DA-A72B-4E21-8D27-1A3B8644AA72@microsoft.com...
>>
>> <Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Email Scanning has never given me any problems.
>>
>> This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
>> teapot as well as bum dope.
>>
>> I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra
>> layer
>> of protection...
>>
>> If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss --
>> and their problem, when something goes wrong....
>>
>> AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.
>>
>> Benefits All 'Round...
>>
>> For Both Me & My Correspondents.
>>
>> It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
>> that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.
>>
>> I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard
>> drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.
>>
>> Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.
>>
>> Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows
>> Live
>> Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.
>>
>> DSH
>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>> Vires et Honor
>>
>> Further:
>>
>> Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems
>>
>> The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and
>> _Goldfinger_]
>> uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
>> systems.
>>
>> Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ
>> redundant
>> and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of
>> little
>> rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....
>>
>> Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these
>> newsgroups
>> are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have
>> seen
>> it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the
>> systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT
>> regularly
>> Clean Up and Compact their files.
>>
>> So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
>> Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...
>>
>> Amusing little fellows they are.
>>
>> Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
>> --
>> D. Spencer Hines
>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>> Vires et Honor
>> Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
>>
>
Author
18 May 2009 8:47 PM
kate
"Hal Hostetler [MVP-P/I]" <h**@kvoa.com> a écrit dans le message de groupe
de discussion : O7mGCoTkJHA.2***@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
Show quoteHide quote
> Not particularly bright, is he?
>
> Hal
> --
> Hal Hostetler, CPBE -- h**@kvoa.com
> Senior Engineer/MIS -- MS MVP-Print/Imaging -- WA7BGX
> http://www.kvoa.com -- "When News breaks, we fix it!"
> KVOA Television, Tucson, AZ.   NBC   Channel 4
> Still Cadillacin' - www.badnewsbluesband.com
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:edWoIGSkJHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Aha. I see that you are starting the second phase of your trolling. Get a
>> life already
>>
>> --
>> Peter
>>
>> Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
>> Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
>>
>> "D. Spencer Hines" <pant***@excelsior.net> wrote in message
>> news:%23AnTnyRkJHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> VERY Unprofessional...
>>>
>>> Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.
>>>
>>> He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
>>> where
>>> he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.
>>>
>>> He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.
>>>
>>> Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
>>> opus.
>>>
>>> Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...
>>>
>>> KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.
>>>
>>> DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.
>>>
>>> DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...
>>>
>>> THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY
>>>
>>> Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.
>>>
>>> Exitus Acta Probat.
>>>
>>> DSH
>>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>>> Vires et Honor
>>>
>>> "Steve Cochran" <scoch***@oehelp.com> wrote in message
>>> news:D80B24DA-A72B-4E21-8D27-1A3B8644AA72@microsoft.com...
>>>
>>> <Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Email Scanning has never given me any problems.
>>>
>>> This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
>>> teapot as well as bum dope.
>>>
>>> I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra
>>> layer
>>> of protection...
>>>
>>> If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their
>>> loss --
>>> and their problem, when something goes wrong....
>>>
>>> AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.
>>>
>>> Benefits All 'Round...
>>>
>>> For Both Me & My Correspondents.
>>>
>>> It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
>>> that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.
>>>
>>> I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my
>>> hard
>>> drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.
>>>
>>> Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.
>>>
>>> Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows
>>> Live
>>> Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.
>>>
>>> DSH
>>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>>> Vires et Honor
>>>
>>> Further:
>>>
>>> Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>>
>>> CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>>
>>> Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems
>>>
>>> The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and
>>> _Goldfinger_]
>>> uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>>
>>> The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>>
>>> Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
>>> systems.
>>>
>>> Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ
>>> redundant
>>> and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of
>>> little
>>> rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....
>>>
>>> Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these
>>> newsgroups
>>> are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have
>>> seen
>>> it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the
>>> systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT
>>> regularly
>>> Clean Up and Compact their files.
>>>
>>> So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
>>> Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...
>>>
>>> Amusing little fellows they are.
>>>
>>> Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
>>> --
>>> D. Spencer Hines
>>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>>> Vires et Honor
>>> Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
>>>
>>
>
Author
19 May 2009 11:36 AM
Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]
"kate" <jp***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8A88FD80-EA15-43C2-A777-588E474843F6@microsoft.com...
<nothing>

And your purpose of posting quotes of someone else's message is?
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
Author
19 May 2009 7:11 PM
Peter Foldes
Also quoted from posts from over 1 year ago

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

Show quoteHide quote
"Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]" <tillman1***@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OTP8%23XH2JHA.5728@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> "kate" <jp***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:8A88FD80-EA15-43C2-A777-588E474843F6@microsoft.com...
> <nothing>
>
> And your purpose of posting quotes of someone else's message is?
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
Author
19 May 2009 9:04 PM
PA Bear [MS MVP]
"kate" has been posting a lot of these empty, spammy replies se 22 Fab-09;
cf.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?enc_author=j2_KuREAAADjBhDSBkIw_7OLE9CStmMQkdEasx1kiYTQavV7mdW13Q&scoring=d


Peter Foldes wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
> Also quoted from posts from over 1 year ago
>
>
> "Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]" <tillman1***@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:OTP8%23XH2JHA.5728@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> "kate" <jp***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:8A88FD80-EA15-43C2-A777-588E474843F6@microsoft.com...
>> <nothing>
>>
>> And your purpose of posting quotes of someone else's message is?
>> --
>> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
Author
17 Feb 2009 9:13 PM
Steve Cochran
I feel sorry for anyone that knows you in real life.


Show quoteHide quote
"D. Spencer Hines" <pant***@excelsior.net> wrote in message
news:%23AnTnyRkJHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> VERY Unprofessional...
>
> Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.
>
> He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
> where
> he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.
>
> He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.
>
> Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
> opus.
>
> Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...
>
> KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.
>
> DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.
>
> DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...
>
> THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY
>
> Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.
>
> Exitus Acta Probat.
>
> DSH
> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
> Vires et Honor
>
> "Steve Cochran" <scoch***@oehelp.com> wrote in message
> news:D80B24DA-A72B-4E21-8D27-1A3B8644AA72@microsoft.com...
>
> <Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Email Scanning has never given me any problems.
>
> This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
> teapot as well as bum dope.
>
> I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra layer
> of protection...
>
> If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss --
> and their problem, when something goes wrong....
>
> AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.
>
> Benefits All 'Round...
>
> For Both Me & My Correspondents.
>
> It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
> that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.
>
> I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard
> drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.
>
> Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.
>
> Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows Live
> Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.
>
> DSH
> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
> Vires et Honor
>
> Further:
>
> Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>
> CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>
> Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems
>
> The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and
> _Goldfinger_]
> uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>
> The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>
> Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
> systems.
>
> Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ
> redundant
> and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of
> little
> rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....
>
> Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these
> newsgroups
> are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have seen
> it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the
> systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT
> regularly
> Clean Up and Compact their files.
>
> So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
> Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...
>
> Amusing little fellows they are.
>
> Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
> --
> D. Spencer Hines
> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
> Vires et Honor
> Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
>
Author
17 Feb 2009 9:45 PM
D. Spencer Hines
Totally Non-Substantive, Unprofessional Reply Duly Noted...

And Discarded With Wry Amusement.

Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

Show quoteHide quote
"Steve Cochran" <scoch***@oehelp.com> wrote in message
news:uFijQSUkJHA.1252@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>I feel sorry for anyone that [sic] knows you in real life.
>
> "D. Spencer Hines" <pant***@excelsior.net> wrote in message
> news:%23AnTnyRkJHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>> VERY Unprofessional...
>>
>> Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.
>>
>> He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
>> where he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important
>> issues.
>>
>> He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.
>>
>> Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
>> opus.
>>
>> Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...
>>
>> KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.
>>
>> DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.
>>
>> DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...
>>
>> THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY
>>
>> Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.
>>
>> Exitus Acta Probat.
>>
>> DSH
>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>> Vires et Honor
>>
>> "Steve Cochran" <scoch***@oehelp.com> wrote in message
>> news:D80B24DA-A72B-4E21-8D27-1A3B8644AA72@microsoft.com...
>>
>> <Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Email Scanning has never given me any problems.
>>
>> This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
>> teapot as well as bum dope.
>>
>> I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra
>> layer of protection...
>>
>> If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss --
>> and their problem, when something goes wrong....
>>
>> AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.
>>
>> Benefits All 'Round...
>>
>> For Both Me & My Correspondents.
>>
>> It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
>> that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.
>>
>> I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard
>> drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.
>>
>> Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.
>>
>> Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows
>> Live Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.
>>
>> DSH
>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>> Vires et Honor
>>
>> Further:
>>
>> Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems
>>
>> The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and
>> _Goldfinger_] uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
>> systems.
>>
>> Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ
>> redundant and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored
>> wailings of little rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....
>>
>> Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these
>> newsgroups are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning
>> because they have seen it lead to corruption of Outlook Express
>> DBX files in the past on the systems of equally ignorant and careless
>> rampant pogues who do NOT regularly Clean Up and Compact
>> their files.
>>
>> So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
>> Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...
>>
>> Amusing little fellows they are.
>>
>> Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
>> --
>> D. Spencer Hines
>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>> Vires et Honor
>> Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
Author
18 May 2009 8:47 PM
kate
"Steve Cochran" <scoch***@oehelp.com> a écrit dans le message de groupe de
discussion : uFijQSUkJHA.1***@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Show quoteHide quote
> I feel sorry for anyone that knows you in real life.
>
>
> "D. Spencer Hines" <pant***@excelsior.net> wrote in message
> news:%23AnTnyRkJHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> VERY Unprofessional...
>>
>> Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.
>>
>> He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
>> where
>> he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.
>>
>> He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.
>>
>> Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
>> opus.
>>
>> Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...
>>
>> KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.
>>
>> DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.
>>
>> DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...
>>
>> THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY
>>
>> Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.
>>
>> Exitus Acta Probat.
>>
>> DSH
>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>> Vires et Honor
>>
>> "Steve Cochran" <scoch***@oehelp.com> wrote in message
>> news:D80B24DA-A72B-4E21-8D27-1A3B8644AA72@microsoft.com...
>>
>> <Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Email Scanning has never given me any problems.
>>
>> This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
>> teapot as well as bum dope.
>>
>> I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra
>> layer
>> of protection...
>>
>> If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss --
>> and their problem, when something goes wrong....
>>
>> AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.
>>
>> Benefits All 'Round...
>>
>> For Both Me & My Correspondents.
>>
>> It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
>> that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.
>>
>> I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard
>> drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.
>>
>> Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.
>>
>> Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows
>> Live
>> Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.
>>
>> DSH
>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>> Vires et Honor
>>
>> Further:
>>
>> Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems
>>
>> The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and
>> _Goldfinger_]
>> uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.
>>
>> Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
>> systems.
>>
>> Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ
>> redundant
>> and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of
>> little
>> rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....
>>
>> Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these
>> newsgroups
>> are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have
>> seen
>> it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the
>> systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT
>> regularly
>> Clean Up and Compact their files.
>>
>> So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
>> Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...
>>
>> Amusing little fellows they are.
>>
>> Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
>> --
>> D. Spencer Hines
>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>> Vires et Honor
>> Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
>>
>
Author
17 Feb 2009 10:28 PM
Sunny
"D. Spencer Hines" <pant***@excelsior.net> wrote in message
news:%23AnTnyRkJHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| VERY Unprofessional...
|
| Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.
|
| He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
where
| he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.
|
| He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.
<snip crap>

Why don't you write your own e-mail software?
(And check back to the NG in 2 years with your progress)