|
outlook
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Folders - Display Actual Address That Email Was Sent ToWe have an email enabled Public Folders that have 25 or so email addresses(SMTP) that can accept mail. Under 5.5, we could add the "TO" column to our Outlook view, and then when opening the Public Folder, we could see the actual SMTP email address that the email came in under. Since moving to Exchange 2003, when we add the "TO" column, it seems to just display the Public Folder name itself--not the actual TO: address that the email address came in under. We had been using this address column to sort by, so it is causing an issue. Now, to try and get the actual email address it came in under, we have to do Tools-Options->Then look at the Internet Header. Is there a known/easy way to make Outlook display the actual email address that mail came in on instead of just the Public Folder name? Thanks for any assistance anyone can give.... In news:uHRXlOh7GHA.3740@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, Art Vandelay <artvandelay***@hotmail.com> typed:Show quote > We have migrated from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. What I tend to do for this is -> > We have an email enabled Public Folders that have 25 or so email > addresses(SMTP) that can accept mail. > > Under 5.5, we could add the "TO" column to our Outlook view, and then > when opening the Public Folder, we could see the actual SMTP email > address that the email came in under. > > Since moving to Exchange 2003, when we add the "TO" column, it seems > to just display the Public Folder name itself--not the actual TO: > address that the email address came in under. We had been using this > address column to sort by, so it is causing an issue. > > Now, to try and get the actual email address it came in under, we > have to do Tools-Options->Then look at the Internet Header. > > Is there a known/easy way to make Outlook display the actual email > address that mail came in on instead of just the Public Folder name? > > Thanks for any assistance anyone can give.... Create individual distribution groups for the separate addresses Add the mailbox (well, in this case, the mail-enabled public folder) as the only member Hide the distribution group from the GAL The display name in the message will be that of the distribution group, not the display name of the ultimate destination (mailbox or public folder). Thanks for the info... We have some Public Folders with 25 or so email
addresses. So, would I make basically 25 distribution groups, with a single email address in each one, then each group points to the Public Folder? "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" <lanwe***@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com> wrote in message Show quote news:%23VUCp2h7GHA.1256@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > In news:uHRXlOh7GHA.3740@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, > Art Vandelay <artvandelay***@hotmail.com> typed: >> We have migrated from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. >> >> We have an email enabled Public Folders that have 25 or so email >> addresses(SMTP) that can accept mail. >> >> Under 5.5, we could add the "TO" column to our Outlook view, and then >> when opening the Public Folder, we could see the actual SMTP email >> address that the email came in under. >> >> Since moving to Exchange 2003, when we add the "TO" column, it seems >> to just display the Public Folder name itself--not the actual TO: >> address that the email address came in under. We had been using this >> address column to sort by, so it is causing an issue. >> >> Now, to try and get the actual email address it came in under, we >> have to do Tools-Options->Then look at the Internet Header. >> >> Is there a known/easy way to make Outlook display the actual email >> address that mail came in on instead of just the Public Folder name? >> >> Thanks for any assistance anyone can give.... > > What I tend to do for this is - > > Create individual distribution groups for the separate addresses > Add the mailbox (well, in this case, the mail-enabled public folder) as > the only member > Hide the distribution group from the GAL > > The display name in the message will be that of the distribution group, > not the display name of the ultimate destination (mailbox or public > folder). > > > In news:O2tit%23j7GHA.140@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, Art Vandelay <artvandelay***@hotmail.com> typed:> Thanks for the info... We have some Public Folders with 25 or so email If you were following my technique, yes - if you cared about 25 individual > addresses. > > So, would I make basically 25 distribution groups, with a single email > address in each one, then each group points to the Public Folder? addresses showing up in a clear way. Show quote > > > "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" > <lanwe***@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com> wrote in > message news:%23VUCp2h7GHA.1256@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> In news:uHRXlOh7GHA.3740@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, >> Art Vandelay <artvandelay***@hotmail.com> typed: >>> We have migrated from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. >>> >>> We have an email enabled Public Folders that have 25 or so email >>> addresses(SMTP) that can accept mail. >>> >>> Under 5.5, we could add the "TO" column to our Outlook view, and >>> then when opening the Public Folder, we could see the actual SMTP >>> email address that the email came in under. >>> >>> Since moving to Exchange 2003, when we add the "TO" column, it seems >>> to just display the Public Folder name itself--not the actual TO: >>> address that the email address came in under. We had been using this >>> address column to sort by, so it is causing an issue. >>> >>> Now, to try and get the actual email address it came in under, we >>> have to do Tools-Options->Then look at the Internet Header. >>> >>> Is there a known/easy way to make Outlook display the actual email >>> address that mail came in on instead of just the Public Folder name? >>> >>> Thanks for any assistance anyone can give.... >> >> What I tend to do for this is - >> >> Create individual distribution groups for the separate addresses >> Add the mailbox (well, in this case, the mail-enabled public folder) >> as the only member >> Hide the distribution group from the GAL >> >> The display name in the message will be that of the distribution >> group, not the display name of the ultimate destination (mailbox or >> public folder).  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics