|
outlook
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Sending from multiple accountsother a MAPI (e.g. Accout 2). My default accout is the POP3. When I download email, the received emails go into the correct folders, that is to say Account 1 email goes in the Busines Folders Inbox and Account 2 mail goes in the Account 2 Inbox folder. No problem there, it works as expect. This issues is this: If I write an email on Account 2 and just click send (remember, account 1 is the POP3 account is default) the email is received as coming from Account 1. If they reply, it comes back to me as an email sent to Account 1. This is very confusion to the people receiveing my email and to me because it shows account 1's email address instead of account 2's email address. I realize that each time I write an email in WORD, i can define which account is sending it (from the Accounts icon on the email toolbar, but this isn't very practical to do each time. Is there a way to automatically send from the correct account when I write an email? The is important so the receipeint sees the correct email it is coming from. I am using the latest outlook/word with all the latest updates. Thanks Bob Bob Day <Bob***@TouchTalk.net> wrote:
> I have two email accounts, one is POP3 (lets call this Account 1) and MAPI? Do you mean it's an Exchange account, or did you really mean to type > the other a MAPI (e.g. Accout 2). My default accout is the POP3. "IMAP"? > When I download email, the received emails go into the correct You can't write an email "on" an account. You compose a message and then > folders, that is to say Account 1 email goes in the Busines Folders > Inbox and Account 2 mail goes in the Account 2 Inbox folder. No > problem there, it works as expect. > > This issues is this: If I write an email on Account 2 send it with an account, either the default account or by choosing one explicitly. When replying, Outlook will always choose the account with which the message was received. > and just click Of course. If you compose a message and don't specify the sending account > send (remember, account 1 is the POP3 account is default) the email > is received as coming from Account 1. If they reply, it comes back > to me as an email sent to Account 1. This is very confusion to the > people receiveing my email and to me because it shows account 1's > email address instead of account 2's email address. explicitly, the default account will be used. > I realize that each time I write an email in WORD, i can define which How would you expect Outlook to know which account to use if you don't > account is sending it (from the Accounts icon on the email toolbar, > but this isn't very practical to do each time. > > Is there a way to automatically send from the correct account when I > write an email? The is important so the receipeint sees the correct > email it is coming from. specify it? No one has invented mind-reading software yet. -- Brian Tillman Unfortunately, it seems like Outlook's implementation of multiple accounts
is SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE than Outlook Express'. In the little brother version, if you have a message in account B selected, and selected "Create Mail" then the message will by default be sent by Account B, even if Account A is default. Outlook, will default to Account A, and only an explicit selection of Account B will be used. Similarly, I have multiple email accounts set up (3xIMAP). No matter which account I select to send the message from, the "Sent Message" gets saved in the same folder - "Personal Folders"|"Sent Items". Outlook Express is smart enough to know to save an email sent from Account B in Account B's Sent Items folder - why can't the paid product do the same? Show quote "Brian Tillman" <tillman1***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:uLNp0kV7GHA.3620@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > <snip> > You can't write an email "on" an account. You compose a message and then > send it with an account, either the default account or by choosing one > explicitly. When replying, Outlook will always choose the account with > which the message was received. > <snip> How would you expect Outlook to know which account to use if you > don't specify it? No one has invented mind-reading software yet. > -- > Brian Tillman PlaneGuy wrote:
> Unfortunately, it seems like Outlook's implementation of multiple accounts Ah - you are obviously using Identities for your separate accounts then?> is SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE than Outlook Express'. In the little brother > version, if you have a message in account B selected, and selected "Create > Mail" then the message will by default be sent by Account B, even if > Account A is default. Outlook, will default to Account A, and only an > explicit selection of Account B will be used. > Correct. That's always been the case. If you need to separate sent items> Similarly, I have multiple email accounts set up (3xIMAP). No matter which > account I select to send the message from, the "Sent Message" gets saved > in the same folder - "Personal Folders"|"Sent Items". than either set up manually a sent items folder for each account and use a rule to move the messages after sending, or use separate Outlook profiles for each account. > Outlook Express is Well I don't know which version of OE you are using, but AFAIK there is NO> smart enough to know to save an email sent from Account B in Account B's > Sent Items folder - why can't the paid product do the same? automatic creation of separate "sent item" folders for separate email accounts UNLESS you use separate Identities. This has been the rule ever since OE4 AFAICR. BTW, Outlook Express is NOT a "free" version of Outlook - the two are totally separate applications aimed at completely different target users. -- Registered Linux User no 240308 to email me invalidate the invalid! Nope. I have one identity that has multiple email accounts set up within it
(HTTP and IMAP accounts, though my discussion relates solely to IMAP accounts. POP accounts may well behave differently). An explanation of how OE works compared to O2003. Lets assume I have 2 accounts, IMAP_1 and IMAP_2. This means my (OE) folder structure will be: Outlook Express - Local Folders ---Inbox --- Outbox --- Sent Items --- - IMAP_1 --- Inbox --- Outbox --- Sent Items -IMAP_2 --- Inbox --- Outbox --- Sent Items The equivelent in O2003, will be: Personal Folders -Inbox -Outbox -Sent Items IMAP_1 -Inbox -Outbox -Sent Items IMAP_2 -Inbox -Outbox -Sent Items Firstly, we'll start with Replying to a message. In OE6, I read a message that is sitting in the IMAP_2/Inbox. I hit reply. The new message box opens, and the message is identified as coming from IMAP_2. I type my message and hit send. The message will be sent, and will appear in IMAP_2/Sent Items. In O2003, I read a message that is sitting in the IMAP_2/Inbox. I hit reply. The new message box opens, and the message is identified as coming from IMAP_2. I type my message and hit send. The message will be sent, and will appear in Personal Folders/Sent Items. Now, what is the point of having an IMAP account, when the sne item is only stored locally, and not back to the server? Now, a typical workflow scenario, including writing a new message: In OE6, I read a message in IMAP_2. Finish reading that one, I move to the next message in IMAP_2. This one from Joe Bloggs, asks me to contact Jane Doe. So, with the message from Joe still in the previe pane, I hit Create Mail, type my message and hit send. The message will be sent from IMAP_2, and will be placed into my IMAP_2/Sent Items folder. In Outlook, I read Joe's message, hit New whilst Joe's message is still in the preview pane, and type the message to Jane. At this stage I have not remembered to select "IMAP_2" from the Accounts Drop Down, and hit send. The message gets sent from IMAP_1 as it is the default account, and then gets saved to the Personal Folders/Sent Items Folder. Is this behaviour not TOTALLY counterintuitive. It is certainly different to how OE6 (and 5 before it) works, as well as different to Thunderbird, and a few other email clients I have used over the years. The concept of a default email account to me is wrong in so many ways. I have a little money making venture that I do at home, as such I have an email account set up for myname@my_hobby_business.com. I also use the computer for my social life, and so have myn***@home.net, and also manage a community organisation, and so have myn***@community.org. Why would I ever want to have an email that I intend to send to a business contact to go out via my social account - that'll look pretty unprofessional. Aah, so you say that I create the business account as default. That means that I can be sending an email to a business group asking them to donate money to a community organisation, when in fact the email address shows a business name. Not all of us are perfect, and I am sure quite a few people have forgotten to select the correct email account from the drop down list. Why not make OE pop up a message if no account is selected "You have not selected an account. Do you want to use the default account (account name) to send this message?" That is just a stop gap, until a solution that is used in every other email client that I have ever used, is implemented, where the currently active account is used as default. Show quote "Gordon" <gbpli***@gmail.com.invalid> wrote in message news:4q6m78Flm162U1@individual.net... > PlaneGuy wrote: > >> Unfortunately, it seems like Outlook's implementation of multiple >> accounts >> is SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE than Outlook Express'. In the little brother >> version, if you have a message in account B selected, and selected >> "Create >> Mail" then the message will by default be sent by Account B, even if >> Account A is default. Outlook, will default to Account A, and only an >> explicit selection of Account B will be used. > > Ah - you are obviously using Identities for your separate accounts then? > >> >> Similarly, I have multiple email accounts set up (3xIMAP). No matter >> which >> account I select to send the message from, the "Sent Message" gets saved >> in the same folder - "Personal Folders"|"Sent Items". > > Correct. That's always been the case. If you need to separate sent items > than either set up manually a sent items folder for each account and use a > rule to move the messages after sending, or use separate Outlook profiles > for each account. > > > >> Outlook Express is >> smart enough to know to save an email sent from Account B in Account B's >> Sent Items folder - why can't the paid product do the same? > > Well I don't know which version of OE you are using, but AFAIK there is NO > automatic creation of separate "sent item" folders for separate email > accounts UNLESS you use separate Identities. This has been the rule ever > since OE4 AFAICR. > > BTW, Outlook Express is NOT a "free" version of Outlook - the two are > totally separate applications aimed at completely different target users. > > > > -- > Registered Linux User no 240308 > to email me invalidate the invalid! PlaneGuy wrote:
> Nope. I have one identity that has multiple email accounts set up within POP account do indeed behave differently. In fact as POP accounts are very> it (HTTP and IMAP accounts, though my discussion relates solely to IMAP > accounts. POP accounts may well behave differently). much the norm, you should have stated initially what you were using. > Snip> > An explanation of how OE works compared to O2003. Yes I'm aware of that, again, you failed to mention the type of accounts in your post. Show quote > All I can say is that Outlook was not originally designed for either IMAP or> > Firstly, we'll start with Replying to a message. > > In OE6, I read a message that is sitting in the IMAP_2/Inbox. I hit reply. > The new message box opens, and the message is identified as coming from > IMAP_2. I type my message and hit send. The message will be sent, and will > appear in IMAP_2/Sent Items. > > In O2003, I read a message that is sitting in the IMAP_2/Inbox. I hit > reply. The new message box opens, and the message is identified as coming > from IMAP_2. I type my message and hit send. The message will be sent, and > will appear in Personal Folders/Sent Items. > > Now, what is the point of having an IMAP account, when the sne item is > only stored locally, and not back to the server? POP accounts.... Show quote > Correct> > Now, a typical workflow scenario, including writing a new message: > > In OE6, I read a message in IMAP_2. Finish reading that one, I move to the > next message in IMAP_2. This one from Joe Bloggs, asks me to contact Jane > Doe. So, with the message from Joe still in the previe pane, I hit Create > Mail, type my message and hit send. The message will be sent from IMAP_2, > and will be placed into my IMAP_2/Sent Items folder. > > In Outlook, I read Joe's message, hit New whilst Joe's message is still in > the preview pane, and type the message to Jane. At this stage I have not > remembered to select "IMAP_2" from the Accounts Drop Down, and hit send. > The message gets sent from IMAP_1 as it is the default account, and then > gets saved to the Personal Folders/Sent Items Folder. > Again, the target users of Outlook (and still the vast majority of users)> Is this behaviour not TOTALLY counterintuitive. It is certainly different > to how OE6 (and 5 before it) works, as well as different to Thunderbird, > and a few other email clients I have used over the years. are in Corporations connected to Exchange Server and who don't have more than one account, certainly not IMAP or HTTPS or POP3. > Then set up separate Outlook Profiles. As I have said above, Outlook is not> The concept of a default email account to me is wrong in so many ways. I > have a little money making venture that I do at home, as such I have an > email account set up for myname@my_hobby_business.com. I also use the > computer for my social life, and so have myn***@home.net, and also manage > a community organisation, and so have myn***@community.org. Why would I > ever want to have an email that I intend to send to a business contact to > go out via my social account - that'll look pretty unprofessional. DESIGNED primarily for multi-account useage. -- Registered Linux User no 240308 to email me invalidate the invalid! Actually I did state in the original post... "Similarly, I have multiple
email accounts set up (3xIMAP). " But anyway, on the argument that Outlook was not designed for multiple accounts - that is the reason why the functionallity is less than adequate, but it shouldn't preclude MS from improving the functionallity. Certainly in the corporate environment that I work in, most people only have one account linked to an Exchange server. However quite a few have access to one or more IMAP accounts, and they share my frustrations with teh implementation. Show quote "Gordon" <gbpli***@gmail.com.invalid> wrote in message news:4q6o1uFlouerU2@individual.net... > PlaneGuy wrote: > >> Nope. I have one identity that has multiple email accounts set up within >> it (HTTP and IMAP accounts, though my discussion relates solely to IMAP >> accounts. POP accounts may well behave differently). > > POP account do indeed behave differently. In fact as POP accounts are very > much the norm, you should have stated initially what you were using. > >> >> >> An explanation of how OE works compared to O2003. > > Snip > > Yes I'm aware of that, again, you failed to mention the type of accounts > in > your post. >> >> >> Firstly, we'll start with Replying to a message. >> >> In OE6, I read a message that is sitting in the IMAP_2/Inbox. I hit >> reply. >> The new message box opens, and the message is identified as coming from >> IMAP_2. I type my message and hit send. The message will be sent, and >> will >> appear in IMAP_2/Sent Items. >> >> In O2003, I read a message that is sitting in the IMAP_2/Inbox. I hit >> reply. The new message box opens, and the message is identified as coming >> from IMAP_2. I type my message and hit send. The message will be sent, >> and >> will appear in Personal Folders/Sent Items. >> >> Now, what is the point of having an IMAP account, when the sne item is >> only stored locally, and not back to the server? > > All I can say is that Outlook was not originally designed for either IMAP > or > POP accounts.... > >> >> >> Now, a typical workflow scenario, including writing a new message: >> >> In OE6, I read a message in IMAP_2. Finish reading that one, I move to >> the >> next message in IMAP_2. This one from Joe Bloggs, asks me to contact Jane >> Doe. So, with the message from Joe still in the previe pane, I hit Create >> Mail, type my message and hit send. The message will be sent from IMAP_2, >> and will be placed into my IMAP_2/Sent Items folder. >> >> In Outlook, I read Joe's message, hit New whilst Joe's message is still >> in >> the preview pane, and type the message to Jane. At this stage I have not >> remembered to select "IMAP_2" from the Accounts Drop Down, and hit send. >> The message gets sent from IMAP_1 as it is the default account, and then >> gets saved to the Personal Folders/Sent Items Folder. > > Correct > >> >> Is this behaviour not TOTALLY counterintuitive. It is certainly different >> to how OE6 (and 5 before it) works, as well as different to Thunderbird, >> and a few other email clients I have used over the years. > > Again, the target users of Outlook (and still the vast majority of users) > are in Corporations connected to Exchange Server and who don't have more > than one account, certainly not IMAP or HTTPS or POP3. > >> >> The concept of a default email account to me is wrong in so many ways. I >> have a little money making venture that I do at home, as such I have an >> email account set up for myname@my_hobby_business.com. I also use the >> computer for my social life, and so have myn***@home.net, and also manage >> a community organisation, and so have myn***@community.org. Why would I >> ever want to have an email that I intend to send to a business contact to >> go out via my social account - that'll look pretty unprofessional. > > Then set up separate Outlook Profiles. As I have said above, Outlook is > not > DESIGNED primarily for multi-account useage. > > > > > -- > Registered Linux User no 240308 > to email me invalidate the invalid! PlaneGuy <planegu***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, it seems like Outlook's implementation of multiple Outlook behaves the same way. When you reply to or forward a message, > accounts is SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE than Outlook Express'. In the little > brother version, if you have a message in account B selected, and > selected "Create Mail" then the message will by default be sent by > Account B, even if Account A is default. Outlook, will default to > Account A, and only an explicit selection of Account B will be used. Outlook will use the account with which the original message was received. > Similarly, I have multiple email accounts set up (3xIMAP). No matter In Outlook, there is only one active "Sent Items" folder and that is the one > which account I select to send the message from, the "Sent Message" > gets saved in the same folder - "Personal Folders"|"Sent Items". > Outlook Express is smart enough to know to save an email sent from > Account B in Account B's Sent Items folder - why can't the paid > product do the same? in the delivery location. It works that way because the team that wrote Outlook, most likely a completely different team than the one that wrote Outlook Express, wanted it to work that way. My understanding is that Outlook 2007 will provide a better IMAP experience and that you can have PSTs associated with accounts so rules won't be necessary to sort messages into PSTs based on receiving or sending account. -- Brian Tillman No, you can't assign a sending account to a contact. You could save
templates with an account selected but you'd need to remember to choose the correct template when composing. -- Show quoteDiane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide) Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/ Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/ Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter: EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQU***@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM "Bob Day" <Bob***@TouchTalk.net> wrote in message news:Oao$8bV7GHA.3452@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >I have two email accounts, one is POP3 (lets call this Account 1) and the > other a MAPI (e.g. Accout 2). My default accout is the POP3. > > When I download email, the received emails go into the correct folders, > that > is to say Account 1 email goes in the Busines Folders Inbox and Account 2 > mail goes in the Account 2 Inbox folder. No problem there, it works as > expect. > > This issues is this: If I write an email on Account 2 and just click send > (remember, account 1 is the POP3 account is default) the email is received > as coming from Account 1. If they reply, it comes back to me as an email > sent to Account 1. This is very confusion to the people receiveing my > and to me because it shows account 1's email address instead of account > 2's > email address. > > I realize that each time I write an email in WORD, i can define which > account is sending it (from the Accounts icon on the email toolbar, but > this > isn't very practical to do each time. > > Is there a way to automatically send from the correct account when I write > an email? The is important so the receipeint sees the correct email it is > coming from. > > I am using the latest outlook/word with all the latest updates. > > Thanks > Bob > > > |
|||||||||||||||||||||||